My complaint about Steven t Krivit
He's sensitive a' and apparently impervious - to criticism, and new transactions demonstrate this. It's been said that a reporter who edits his or her own work has a fool for an editor, and Krivit has shown that. His idea that theories decide phenomena, as opposed to the change.
"The sensation you have observed is difficult, crazy stuff. We know of no mechanism that could describe your results, so we have serious suspicions concerning the accuracy your report. There's no place on your
Leads to modern theory, so that they simply cannot occur. You're demonstrably the victim of mistakes, hoaxers, or self-delusion. We do not need to submit your paper, and any attempts at replicating your results would have been a waste of time. Your requests for money steven krivit are misguided, and should be turned down."aa
Previously Krivit was working with the major researchers in the area. Most of them will not talk with him any more, because he twists what they say, removing whatever he can state is wrong and offering that and emphasizing it, with an important exception: he is Mr. Kid Gloves when it comes to Widom-Larsen theory.aa I have been finding that he's reconfigured his web site to make it difficult to discover criticism of W-L theory, and in new posts -- underneath the name "Critique of Widom-Larsen theory" -- I've reported this. What he's granted, probably as it was published under peer review or individually, he provides with a introduction.AWhat he accuses others of is what he's, himself, doing.
This letter isn't a debate contest by which I encourage one to accept me or vice versa. This letter is concerned only with establishing the facts about Steven w Krivit. Before I say anything else, allow me to advise Steven that there is a problem here. A large, careless, uncompromising one.
I'm no doctor. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry I may state that Steven appears to present many of the outward indications of Asperger's syndrome. I really do not say that to judge but only to put Steven's rapacious, inaniloquent plans into perspective. He says that facts are merely a cultural construct. That's a silly thing to say. It's like saying the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions.
Steven centers around emotions instead of facts. Certain, he tries to twist and distort details to justify his feelings, but that just goes to show that in my view, every one ought to be aware of the real history of Steven's junta. Even though his junta started as a faction of his frightful coven, it quickly morphed into Steven's primary mechanism for parlaying personal and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire.
The importance with this transformation is that the claim that without Steven's superior advice, we are going to get nowhere is illusory. That fact might not be pleasant, but it is just a fact aside from our needs on the matter.
Steven is extremely nasty. But, since the Buddha remarked, there's to be evil in order that good could show its purity above it. I am sure that when the Buddha lived in modern times, though, he'd also comment on how Steven's remonstrations might have been conceived in idealism, but they rapidly degenerated into unprincipled academicism.
In spite of no further evidence than what I've previously introduced I'd allegea'and no person on Earth can alter my opiniona'that if we fail to generate a feeling of responsibility and maturity in those that make conditions much worse than can actually have been the case without his addlepated efforts then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The "decay of that enormous wreck," since the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that all of the negative things that are currently going on are an indication of Steven's ugly prAcis. They're not really a cause; they're an impact. We ought to build and cultivate a real spirit of community. To accomplish anything else, and I do mean anything else, can be a total waste of time.
Pertinacious pseudo-intellectuals exacerbate and promote passivity in certain individuals who might otherwise be effective and responsible individuals. Having said that, we ought to perhaps not lose sight of who the real enemy is: Steven b Krivit and his meretricious loyalists. One may possibly conclude that his winding and maundering comments surely suggest that Steven intends to influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any setting or action that is primarily slaphappy someday soon.
As an alternative, one may conclude he gives answers to complex problems. Either way, there are two sorts of people in this world. There are those who stifle dissent, and there are those who address the legitimate rage, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Steven since they saw no other options for change. Steven fits nicely in to the former group, naturally. Sorry for babbling so much, but Steven t Krivit wants everybody else to appeal to his every idiosyncratic wish.
"Talent hits a target no-one else can hit; pro hits targets no-one
else can see." - SchopenhauerSteven Krivit Paid by Charles Entenmann & Widom- Larsen?
